“The Sandy Hook Shooting – Fully Exposed” is a YouTube video that has quickly garnered over 10 million views questioning the official story about last month’s elementary school massacre. In this post I will prove to you there has been a lot of deception surrounding this Sandy Hook Shooting video. This is a simple, logical post. No aliens, holigrams, rituals, or anything like that. Just facts.
Let’s make the story we have been told clear. According to the video, there were no children who perished at Sandy Hook Elementary School on December 14, 2012. People acting sad were unconvincing actors with holes in their stories and mistakes in their actions. The whole thing is a hoax, possibly perpetrated by the government or Illuminati to take away our guns.
If this is true, it is truly one of the most saddening conspiracies ever pulled off in the U.S. And after watching the video, you would have no reason to question it. The clips, the images, the background music, the sans-serif text, the misspelled words. Why would they lie about something like this? How could they pull off something so horrible?
More importantly, who could possibly have something to gain from something like this? Like everyone who watched the video in the last two weeks, I felt a chilling sadness. However, after investigating for myself, my sadness quickly became confusion, frustration, and disbelief, you are about to see why, this is a run-on sentence. Here are some things that show another side to that “Official Hoax Story.”
The first clue that something is wrong with the video is that it is sub-titled “Fully Exposed,” yet the second frame says “New information comes up every day,” and “there may be a lot more evidence that has come to light. If more evidence can come to light, how can the shooting be “fully exposed”?
The video asks how interviewed parents could be smiling so soon after their child was murdered. Is there no possibility they were reminiscing about their favorite moments with their clever, beautiful, and lovely child? The audio is conveniently muted, and the video claims that they only had a muted clip to work with. But this is Anderson Cooper! Look, I know you might not want to ask these kinds of questions, but how can you not find a regular un-muted clip of Anderson Cooper… unless you don’t want to find it?
The video asks how the shooter could have gotten his brother’s ID when they had not seen each other for years. But how do we know that they hadn’t seen each other for years? Even if they hadn’t, is there no possibility that the shooter and his brother used to live in the same house, and the brother lost or left his ID in that house at some point, and it was later recovered by the shooter? In fact, I lost my ID at my parents’ house once. How could the video’s creator not consider this?
The video claims there is a 57-year-old Robbie Parker in Newtown, but the Robbie Parker in the video clips looks much younger. Is there no possibility that there is more than one Robert Parker in Connecticut? Robert and Parker are both fairly common names. In fact, I knew two Robbie Parkers in high school.
The video asks why there was no path for an ambulance in the cars surrounding the school. Is there no possibility that injured victims could have been airlifted to a hospital by helicopter? In fact, I was airlifted to a hospital by helicopter once.
The video shows us a (supposed) family picture of the Parkers before the shooting and a (supposed) picture of the Parkers with Obama after the shooting, and claims that one of the girls in both pictures is Emilie Parker. But how do we know that this girl is Emilie Parker? The first picture has two other children, and the second picture has four other different-looking children, so how do we even know that we are looking at consistent pictures of the same family here?
The video claims that the Parkers were creating a Facebook page for their daughter the day of the shooting, even though the text in the screenshot clearly states that someone else is making the Facebook page for them. There is simply no way that someone could take these screenshots and not notice this. Remember, you can always research yourself.
The video claims that the Medical Examiner makes unreliable and suspicious statements, but the clip is clearly doctored. In fact, the creator of the video has overlaid some text claiming that the clip was cut to save time. Yet the clip runs on for several minutes, repeating some “key” excerpts of the examiner’s testimony multiple times. If there was no time to show other portions of the clip, why was there time to repeat the portions of the clip that the video creator wants us to focus on?
The video shows screenshots of timestamps from Facebook (and in a later video, from Vimeo) that suggest tributes were created before the shooting took place. But screenshots can be doctored, databases can be corrupted, and old pages and videos can have their contents updated without changing the timestamps. (Look at the top of this page! I posted this blog post the day before that YouTube video was made!! How did I know that this video was coming???)
There are so many more problems with this video (and the other videos), it’s mind blowing, but I will let you check that out on your own.
No Logical Conclusions
The video wants us to believe that no children were murdered on that horrible day. The video knows that we would wish this to be possible. But let’s think about what this requires us to believe. I am only following the logical conclusion of this idea, and the results are completely illogical.
If Sandy Hook Elementary is a “movie set” and not a real school as the video claims, where have the hundreds of families in the surrounding community been sending their children to school the last few years? Why has no one come forward to claim that this building has never been a school?
If Sandy Hook Elementary is a real school, but the twenty children on the list were not murdered, there are only two possibilities. Either the children never went to the school and maybe even never existed, or the children went to the school but are not in fact dead.
If the children never went to the school, this should be easy to prove. Why has no one from the community come forward with a yearbook showing that none of the first graders on the list were in the kindergarten class last year? Would that not be incredibly suspicious? Why has no one else at the school come forward to say that they never heard of any of these children?
If the children truly existed and did go to the school, but are not dead, then where are they now? The video suggests that they are still with their families, and that one of them even accidentally took a picture with President Obama. But how would the master planners of such an immense conspiracy allow that to happen? On the other hand, if they were so dumb as to allow that to happen, how have they not allowed more obvious mistakes?
Think about how many people know about the existence of one first-grade child, from friends and parents of friends to grandparents and cousins and neighbors and church members and girl scout troops and Little Leagues and so forth. If the children are still living with their families, how has no one seen any of them still alive? Are the families going to keep them locked up inside their houses with no visitors for the rest of their lives? Are they randomly going to tell everyone they “adopted” new children that look just like their old children?
There is simply no explanation. Who has the capacity to imagine so many possible holes in a story without also having the capacity to imagine any possible explanations for such alleged holes? The questions and images are paraded just quickly enough to be intriguing without giving you time to think about any of the obvious holes in the holes.
No, it is unbelievable that someone could really believe in this hoax enough to make this video. There are too many contradictions and easily-explained questions, and the overall claim is simply too grandiose to even be plausible. It’s as if someone saw the success of the 9/11 truther movement and decided to take things up a notch, not by claiming the equivalent of 9/11 being caused by the government, but by claiming the equivalent of 9/11 never even happening! I smell B.S. Major, major, major B.S.
Yet someone clearly wants to look like they are trying to convince people of a hoax: the conveniently doctored clips and muted audio and external links that have been “removed,” the unsupported assumptions, the hand-waving assertions of more evidence that is never presented, the way every person’s statement that supports the official story is untrusted but every person’s statement that contradicts the official story is taken at face value… No one could possibly believe this. But who would possibly have a motive for faking it?
The Mental Health Conspiracy
Earlier this week, the state of New York passed some of the strictest gun control laws in the country. Most of the news focused on restrictions on types of guns and the number of rounds, but there is something else:
The laws fortify New York’s existing assault weapons ban, limit the number of bullets allowed in magazines and strengthen rules that govern the mentally ill, which includes a requirement to report potentially harmful behavior.
We have heard a lot of talk since Newtown about keeping guns away from the mentally ill, and states are now passing laws to do so. What is curious about New York’s law is that the lawmakers were given almost no time to read the bill but were urged to pass it immediately – kinda like the so-called “Patriot Act” after 9/11.
Now there are people actively working to try to get 9/11 truthers officially branded as “mentally ill.” Is it possible that Sandy Hook truthers will be given the same label? And now, with these new laws, would the government would have an excuse to take their guns away? Did the government create this hoax video to deliberately label anyone who watches it as a truther so they can declare them mentally ill and take their guns away? I’m just asking questions.
Isn’t something like this Sandy Hook hoax video just what the government needs to start disarming anyone who dares question the official story? Is this great big hoax a great big hoax? Sure seems like it when you see the facts.
I hope this post has made you think. Investigate for yourself and be careful who you trust. Especially if you trust what you see on YouTube or on some random forum. Don’t let your friends fall for this hoax hoax. Thank you.
DON’T CLICK ANYWHERE TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS BLOG FOR MORE INFORMATION BECAUSE I WILL NEVER POST ABOUT THIS STUPID HOAX EVER AGAIN.
_____________________________________________________________
P.S. I would hope it goes without saying, but since sarcasm tags don’t show up properly in many browsers, Yes, This Is Satire. I am simply attempting to use the same ridiculous logic that suggests that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax, to suggest that the suggestion that the Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax is a hoax. I’ve never known anyone named Robert Parker. Or have I? You don’t know. These are just pixels on the Internet. THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT!